Files
nextcloud-mcp-server/tests/server/test_jwt_tokens.py
T

209 lines
7.0 KiB
Python

"""
Test JWT token structure and scope support.
This test obtains a JWT token via OAuth and examines its structure.
"""
import base64
import json
import pytest
def decode_jwt_without_verification(token: str) -> dict:
"""
Decode JWT token without signature verification (for inspection only).
Returns:
Dict with header and payload
"""
parts = token.split(".")
if len(parts) != 3:
raise ValueError(f"Invalid JWT format: expected 3 parts, got {len(parts)}")
# Decode header
header = json.loads(
base64.urlsafe_b64decode(parts[0] + "=" * (4 - len(parts[0]) % 4))
)
# Decode payload
payload = json.loads(
base64.urlsafe_b64decode(parts[1] + "=" * (4 - len(parts[1]) % 4))
)
return {
"header": header,
"payload": payload,
}
@pytest.mark.integration
async def test_jwt_token_structure_with_custom_client():
"""
Test that we can create a JWT-enabled OAuth client and examine the token structure.
This test manually configures a JWT client and obtains a token.
"""
import os
import httpx
# This test requires manual setup of a JWT client
# Skip if not configured
client_id = os.getenv("NEXTCLOUD_JWT_CLIENT_ID")
if not client_id:
pytest.skip("NEXTCLOUD_JWT_CLIENT_ID not set - skipping JWT token test")
_client_secret = os.getenv("NEXTCLOUD_JWT_CLIENT_SECRET")
nextcloud_host = os.getenv("NEXTCLOUD_HOST", "http://localhost:8080")
# Fetch discovery
async with httpx.AsyncClient() as client:
discovery_response = await client.get(
f"{nextcloud_host}/.well-known/openid-configuration"
)
discovery_response.raise_for_status()
discovery = discovery_response.json()
_token_endpoint = discovery["token_endpoint"]
# For this test, we'll use client credentials grant if supported
# Otherwise, skip this test
pytest.skip(
"JWT token test requires OAuth flow - use manual testing script instead"
)
@pytest.mark.integration
async def test_opaque_token_vs_jwt_comparison():
"""
Compare opaque tokens vs JWT tokens to understand the differences.
This is a documentation test that explains the findings.
"""
# This test documents our findings about JWT vs opaque tokens
# Based on manual testing with the test script
findings = {
"oidc_app_capabilities": {
"supports_jwt_tokens": True,
"supports_opaque_tokens": True,
"configuration_method": "per-client via token_type field",
"jwt_standard": "RFC 9068 (OAuth 2.0 Access Token JWT Profile)",
},
"dynamic_registration": {
"sets_allowed_scopes": False,
"note": "Dynamic registration does NOT populate allowed_scopes from the scope parameter in registration request",
"workaround": "Must use occ oidc:create with --allowed_scopes flag or manually update via web UI/API",
},
"jwt_token_structure": {
"header": {
"typ": "at+JWT", # RFC 9068 access token type
"alg": "RS256", # Signature algorithm
},
"payload_claims": {
"iss": "issuer URL",
"sub": "user ID",
"aud": "client ID",
"exp": "expiration timestamp",
"iat": "issued at timestamp",
"scope": "space-separated scope string (THIS IS THE KEY!)",
"client_id": "client identifier",
"jti": "JWT ID",
# Optional based on scopes:
"roles": "if roles scope present",
"groups": "if groups scope present",
"email": "if email scope present",
"name": "if profile scope present",
},
"scope_claim": {
"format": "space-separated string",
"example": "openid profile email nc:read nc:write",
"extraction": "payload['scope'].split()",
},
},
"scope_validation": {
"oidc_app": {
"validates": True,
"method": "Intersects requested scopes with allowed_scopes per client",
"location": "LoginRedirectorController.php:251-267",
},
"user_oidc_app": {
"validates_scopes": False,
"validates": ["token expiration", "issuer", "audience (optional)"],
"limitation": "Does NOT extract or validate scopes from JWT",
},
},
"token_size": {
"opaque": "72 characters",
"jwt": "~800-1200 characters (depends on claims)",
"overhead": "JWT is 10-15x larger than opaque tokens",
},
"recommendation": {
"for_mcp_server": "Use JWT tokens with self-validation",
"reasoning": [
"Can extract scopes directly from token payload",
"No additional API call needed",
"Standard approach (RFC 9068)",
"Works with existing oidc app",
],
"alternative": "Implement introspection endpoint in oidc app (future work)",
},
}
# Print findings for documentation
print("\n" + "=" * 80)
print("JWT Token vs Opaque Token Findings")
print("=" * 80)
print(json.dumps(findings, indent=2))
print("=" * 80 + "\n")
# This test always passes - it's for documentation
assert True, "Findings documented"
@pytest.mark.integration
async def test_scope_presence_in_jwt():
"""
Verify that custom scopes (nc:read, nc:write) are present in JWT tokens.
NOTE: This test documents the expected behavior based on manual testing.
Actual implementation will be tested in integration tests after JWT validation is implemented.
"""
expected_behavior = {
"client_configuration": {
"allowed_scopes": "openid profile email nc:read nc:write",
"token_type": "jwt",
},
"authorization_request": {
"scope": "openid profile email nc:read nc:write",
},
"token_response": {
"access_token": "JWT with scope claim",
},
"jwt_payload": {
"scope": "openid profile email nc:read nc:write", # All requested scopes present if in allowed_scopes
},
"scope_filtering": {
"description": "oidc app filters requested scopes against allowed_scopes",
"example": {
"requested": "openid profile nc:read nc:write nc:admin",
"allowed": "openid profile email nc:read nc:write",
"granted": "openid profile nc:read nc:write", # nc:admin filtered out, email not requested
},
},
}
print("\n" + "=" * 80)
print("Expected JWT Scope Behavior")
print("=" * 80)
print(json.dumps(expected_behavior, indent=2))
print("=" * 80 + "\n")
assert True, "Expected behavior documented"
if __name__ == "__main__":
# Run with: uv run pytest tests/server/test_jwt_tokens.py -v
pytest.main([__file__, "-v", "-s"])