This commit completes the OAuth audience validation implementation per RFC 7519,
RFC 8707 (Resource Indicators), and RFC 9728 (Protected Resource Metadata).
## Key Changes
### OAuth Resource Parameters (RFC 8707)
- Add `resource` parameter to Flow 1 (MCP client auth) with MCP server audience
- Add `resource` parameter to Flow 2 (Nextcloud access) with Nextcloud audience
- Add `nextcloud_resource_uri` to oauth_context configuration
- Fix undefined variable error in starlette_lifespan
### PRM-Based Resource Discovery (RFC 9728)
- Update tests to fetch resource identifier from PRM endpoint
- Add fallback to hardcoded value if PRM fetch fails
- Demonstrate correct OAuth client implementation pattern
### ADR-005 Documentation Updates
- Update to reflect simplified RFC 7519 compliant implementation
- Document that MCP validates only its own audience (not Nextcloud's)
- Add section on OAuth resource parameters and PRM discovery
- Update implementation checklist to show completed items
- Mark status as "Implemented" with update date
## Implementation Details
The solution follows RFC 7519 Section 4.1.3: resource servers validate only
their own presence in the audience claim. This simplifies the logic while
maintaining security:
- MCP server validates MCP audience only
- Nextcloud independently validates its own audience
- No dual validation required at MCP layer
- Token reuse is allowed per RFC 8707 for multi-audience tokens
## Test Results
✅ test_mcp_oauth_server_connection - PASSED
✅ test_deck_board_view_permissions - PASSED
✅ test_prm_endpoint - PASSED
All OAuth flows now properly specify target resources, resulting in correct
audience validation throughout the system.
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Per RFC 7519 Section 4.1.3, resource servers should only validate their
own presence in the audience claim, not check for other resource servers.
Changes:
- UnifiedTokenVerifier now validates only MCP audience (not Nextcloud's)
- Nextcloud independently validates its own audience when receiving API calls
- This is NOT token passthrough (we validate tokens before use)
- This IS token reuse which is explicitly allowed by RFC 8707
Updates:
- Simplified _validate_multi_audience() to follow OAuth spec
- Updated docstrings and comments to clarify RFC 7519 compliance
- Fixed unit tests that expected dual-audience validation
- Updated ADR-005 to document the correct OAuth interpretation
- All tests pass: unit (65), smoke (5), OAuth integration
This makes the implementation simpler, more maintainable, and properly
aligned with OAuth 2.0 specifications while maintaining security.
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
This ADR addresses the critical token passthrough vulnerability identified
in Issue #261 by proposing a unified token verifier that eliminates the
security issue while maintaining flexibility.
Key changes:
- Consolidates two non-compliant verifiers into single UnifiedTokenVerifier
- Implements two-layer architecture (verification + exchange)
- Supports multi-audience mode (default) and token exchange mode (opt-in)
- Removes all token passthrough paths to comply with MCP security spec
- Works within python-sdk constraints using proper separation of concerns
The solution provides:
- Single source of truth for token validation
- MCP specification compliance
- Minimal performance impact (1-2% of LLM request time)
- Clear migration path for existing deployments
BREAKING CHANGE: All OAuth deployments must be reconfigured to specify
resource URIs (NEXTCLOUD_MCP_SERVER_URL and NEXTCLOUD_RESOURCE_URI) and
choose between multi-audience or token exchange mode.
Related: #261
Supersedes: Token passthrough mode in ADR-004
🤖 Generated with [Claude Code](https://claude.com/claude-code)
Co-Authored-By: Claude <noreply@anthropic.com>
Chris Coutinho